On Monday the 2nd
of November, 2015, Q and A recorded and aired an episode that had
Paul Erhlich on the panel. His appearance was ineluctably refreshing
- he had no personal or domestic political agenda and he spoke
frankly on some topics that, sadly these days it seems, are
universally taboo. He opined on religious education of children,
growth of economics and human population, mining, taxes, possibility
of nuclear war and the scourge of right wing neo-conservatism.
It was easy to feel
the discomfort of the host, some of the panel and much of the
audience when not only such taboo subjects were raised but when
someone dared to offer an opinion contrary to beliefs that are widely
deemed unquestionable (let me state economic growth as one example of
a sacrosanct belief in the modern world). I get the feeling that the
debate on this show is strictly controlled to be within tight,
acceptable boundaries. Sure, sometimes the debate is allowed to
become quite heated or fierce within those boundaries, but some
territory (perfectly valid and pertinent territory) is strictly off
limits.
It is outrageous
that this show is the most open debate that is available for TV
viewers and it's even more outrageous that the ABC has recently been
held to ransom by right winged governments and mainstream media to
present a so called balanced view. These balanced view advocates
essentially want extreme right-winged neo-conservative views to be
able to be voiced unchallenged. And if that requires outright lies to
be aired, and character assassinations to be the norm, then so be it.
It is my belief these forces want to keep the masses in a state of
fear and therefore conservative in their voting habits – no wonder
the poor old Greens fare so badly on election days.
After this show I
began to think about the desperate need in this country for a more
open and fair debate on subjects and opinions that have been deemed
off limits. In my reactionary mood I do confess to a desire for
radical left wing viewpoints to be aired. I want (and I believe a
large number of us want) a show based on facts, a show that is framed
in secular humanist language, a show that gives a platform to
selfless well informed individuals and a show willing to tackle the
taboo subjects. At heart I want a show where hatred, lies and
deception are called out immediately. The Q and A fact check is a
great thing but I fear that it is too little too late. It also has no
teeth and by the time it publishes its findings the liars have
achieved their goal.
Personally, I am
passionate about the all pervasive myth that growth is good. Talking
against population growth and economic growth in particular is taboo.
I believe the mantra of ever increasing improvement that permeates
our schools, our sports and in the workplace, is just another
variation of the growth myth that is detrimental to our general
well-being. The growth myth is underpinned by a world view that
paints Homo sapiens as a flawed being marked by sin that must
continually strive to improve and redeem itself. This is
fundamentally a religious construct but also a modern Hobbesian
perspective on humanity. I want a show that will get us thinking
about and challenging these fundamental ideas we have about
ourselves. These crazy ideas that have us speeding ever faster and
faster to inevitable collapse. These ideas that are taboo to oppose.
In my fantasising I
was trying to think who could produce and/or host a show such as
this. You came to mind.
To my surprise the
very next week I watched you on Q and A advocating for Euthanasia
Laws – talk about taboo land. Your arsenal of factual information,
your empathy for humanity, your rational and calm demeanour and your
admirable and fearless challenging of emotionally based language and
questionable facts were as refreshing as Paul Ehrlich was the week
before. It confirmed my opinion that you could be the person to host
a TV show of the ilk I am trying to describe.
I am sure you are a
busy man and I believe you retired from TV altogether. But I sensed a
passion in you that might indicate that you are sick of the bullshit
and narrow debate that pollutes the airwaves these days. I wonder if
you may be itching to get back on set to blow away the infuriating
constraints that are holding Australia back from being a land of no
bullshit, a land of fair dinkum down to earth people who don't
blindly and mindlessly follow the psychopaths with all the money and
power.
Kind regards,
Sean Crawley.
No comments:
Post a Comment